mirror of
https://github.com/justinethier/cyclone.git
synced 2025-07-16 17:27:33 +02:00
WIP
This commit is contained in:
parent
8f06bd8de9
commit
0526dadde7
1 changed files with 22 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -9,14 +9,20 @@
|
|||
(srfi 69)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
(define (analyze:find-known-lambdas exp)
|
||||
;TODO: scan for well-known lambdas:
|
||||
;- app of a lambda is well-known, that's easy
|
||||
;- lambda can be passed as a cont. If we can identify all the places the cont is called (?) and it is not used for anything but calls, then I suppose that also qualifies as well-known.
|
||||
; this is more problematic to generate code for, though.
|
||||
; may need a lookup table of symbol to well-known function (if any)
|
||||
;- ?? must be other cases
|
||||
(define *well-known-lambda-sym-lookup-tbl* #f)
|
||||
|
||||
;; Does the given symbol refer to a well-known lambda?
|
||||
(define (well-known-lambda? sym)
|
||||
(and *well-known-lambda-sym-lookup-tbl*
|
||||
(hash-table-ref/default *well-known-lambda-sym-lookup-tbl* sym #f)))
|
||||
|
||||
;; Scan for well-known lambdas:
|
||||
;; - app of a lambda is well-known, that's easy
|
||||
;; - lambda passed as a cont. If we can identify all the places the cont is
|
||||
;; called and it is not used for anything but calls, then I suppose that
|
||||
;; also qualifies as well-known.
|
||||
;; - ?? must be other cases
|
||||
(define (analyze:find-known-lambdas exp)
|
||||
;; Lambda conts that are candidates for well-known functions,
|
||||
;; we won't know until we check exactly how the cont is used...
|
||||
(define candidates (make-hash-table))
|
||||
|
@ -25,7 +31,7 @@
|
|||
;; ast:lam - AST Lambda object
|
||||
;; param-sym - Symbol of the parameter that the lambda is passed as
|
||||
(define (add-candidate! ast:lam param-sym)
|
||||
(hash-table-set! candidates param-sym (ast:lambda-id ast:lam)))
|
||||
(hash-table-set! candidates param-sym ast:lam))
|
||||
|
||||
;; Remove given lambda from candidate table
|
||||
;; param-sym - Symbol representing the lambda to remove
|
||||
|
@ -33,6 +39,7 @@
|
|||
(hash-table-delete! candidates param-sym))
|
||||
|
||||
(define (found exp)
|
||||
;; TODO: turn into a trace, update corresponding adbf in analysis DB
|
||||
(write `(found known lambda with id ,(ast:lambda-id exp)))
|
||||
(newline))
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -85,9 +92,14 @@
|
|||
|
||||
;(trace:error `(update-lambda-atv! ,syms ,value))
|
||||
(scan exp)
|
||||
(write "Other known lambdas:")
|
||||
(write (hash-table->alist candidates))
|
||||
(for-each
|
||||
(lambda (sym/lamb)
|
||||
(found (cdr sym/lamb)))
|
||||
(hash-table->alist candidates))
|
||||
(newline)
|
||||
;; Save the candidate list so we can use it to lookup
|
||||
;; well-known lambda's by var references to them.
|
||||
(set! *well-known-lambda-sym-lookup-tbl* candidates)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
;; TEST code:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue