From 2bf72a34a0ba70a4db79b61bbf3959afeff24b0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Justin Ethier Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:50:54 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] New title --- ...-Speed-Improvement-Lessons-in-Profiling-and-Debugging.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/_posts/2017-06-05-A-Massive-Speed-Improvement-Lessons-in-Profiling-and-Debugging.md b/_posts/2017-06-05-A-Massive-Speed-Improvement-Lessons-in-Profiling-and-Debugging.md index 9c52b808..420055db 100644 --- a/_posts/2017-06-05-A-Massive-Speed-Improvement-Lessons-in-Profiling-and-Debugging.md +++ b/_posts/2017-06-05-A-Massive-Speed-Improvement-Lessons-in-Profiling-and-Debugging.md @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ --- layout: post -title: A Massive Speed Improvement - Lessons in Profiling and Debugging +title: Using the C Profiler and Debugger with Cyclone Scheme excerpt: While going through a new run of the R7RS benchmarks from Larceny, I noticed Cyclone performed significantly worse than other schemes on the tail benchmark. --- -While going through a new run of the [R7RS benchmarks from Larceny](http://www.larcenists.org/benchmarksGenuineR7Linux.html), I noticed Cyclone performed significantly worse than other schemes on the tail benchmark. Certainly when testing locally the results are less than impressive: +While going through a new run of the [R7RS benchmarks from Larceny](http://www.larcenists.org/benchmarksGenuineR7Linux.html), I noticed Cyclone performed significantly worse than other schemes on the tail benchmark. Certainly when testing locally the results are disappointing: [justin@justin-pc r7rs-benchmarks]$ ./bench cyclone tail @@ -192,4 +192,4 @@ After rebuilding with this fix we can re-run the tail benchmark: user 0m0.540s sys 0m0.187s -Whoa! Remember the older code took over 32 seconds to finish? Now it finishes in less than a second. Not bad. +Whoa! Remember how the older code took over 32 seconds to finish? Now it finishes in less than a second. Not bad.