Fcalva/cyclone
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/justinethier/cyclone.git synced 2025-05-24 04:25:06 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

New title

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Justin Ethier 2017-06-15 23:50:54 -04:00
parent c45f8a695c
commit 2bf72a34a0
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
_posts/2017-06-05-A-Massive-Speed-Improvement-Lessons-in-Profiling-and-Debugging.md
View file

@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
--- ---
layout: post layout: post
title: A Massive Speed Improvement - Lessons in Profiling and Debugging title: Using the C Profiler and Debugger with Cyclone Scheme
excerpt: While going through a new run of the R7RS benchmarks from Larceny, I noticed Cyclone performed significantly worse than other schemes on the tail benchmark. excerpt: While going through a new run of the R7RS benchmarks from Larceny, I noticed Cyclone performed significantly worse than other schemes on the tail benchmark.
--- ---
While going through a new run of the [R7RS benchmarks from Larceny](http://www.larcenists.org/benchmarksGenuineR7Linux.html), I noticed Cyclone performed significantly worse than other schemes on the tail benchmark. Certainly when testing locally the results are less than impressive: While going through a new run of the [R7RS benchmarks from Larceny](http://www.larcenists.org/benchmarksGenuineR7Linux.html), I noticed Cyclone performed significantly worse than other schemes on the tail benchmark. Certainly when testing locally the results are disappointing:
[justin@justin-pc r7rs-benchmarks]$ ./bench cyclone tail [justin@justin-pc r7rs-benchmarks]$ ./bench cyclone tail
@ -192,4 +192,4 @@ After rebuilding with this fix we can re-run the tail benchmark:
user 0m0.540s user 0m0.540s
sys 0m0.187s sys 0m0.187s
Whoa! Remember the older code took over 32 seconds to finish? Now it finishes in less than a second. Not bad. Whoa! Remember how the older code took over 32 seconds to finish? Now it finishes in less than a second. Not bad.