From 6c5b05aa121b8f4c374c86129ed37aae131204b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Ethier <justin.ethier@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 22:12:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Link new images

---
 ...Writing-the-Cyclone-Scheme-Compiler-Revision-1.md | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/Writing-the-Cyclone-Scheme-Compiler-Revision-1.md b/docs/Writing-the-Cyclone-Scheme-Compiler-Revision-1.md
index 2c2fc2f0..1e08a77a 100644
--- a/docs/Writing-the-Cyclone-Scheme-Compiler-Revision-1.md
+++ b/docs/Writing-the-Cyclone-Scheme-Compiler-Revision-1.md
@@ -384,17 +384,9 @@ From Feeley's presentation:
 
 Compared to a similar compiler (CHICKEN), Cyclone's performance is worse but also "not so bad":
 
-     $ time cyclone -d transforms.sld
-    
-    real    0m6.802s
-    user    0m4.444s
-    sys     0m1.512s
+<img src="images/benchmark-tests-finished.png">
 
-    $ time csc -t transforms.scm
-    
-    real    0m1.084s
-    user    0m0.512s
-    sys     0m0.380s
+<img src="images/benchmark-total-runtimes.png">
 
 Thanks for reading!