Fcalva/cyclone
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/justinethier/cyclone.git synced 2025-05-23 20:15:05 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

WIP - smarter inline analysis of vector-set

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Justin Ethier 2018-11-07 18:08:09 -05:00
parent 62a8110647
commit a12ef15559
1 changed files with 11 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
scheme/cyclone/cps-optimizations.sld
View file

@ -582,6 +582,7 @@
;; is what is mutated
(cond
((and (prim:mutates? (car exp))
;; loop3-dev WIP step #1 - do not immediately reject these prims
(not (member (car exp) '(vector-set!))) ;; TODO: experimental
)
(let ((e (cadr exp)))
@ -1279,11 +1280,16 @@
(if (not (ref? e))
(inline-ok? e ivars args arg-used return)))
(reverse (cdr exp))))
TODO: add a new cond here
;; TODO: if mutates, can we check to see if there are any "safe" params which we
;; can safely ignore? for example, on vector-set! we know only the vec arg is being mutated,
;; so ivars in other positions can be ignored
(else
;; loop3-dev WIP step #2 - some args can be safely ignored
((and (prim? (car exp))
(prim:mutates? (car exp))
(member (car exp) '(vector-set!))
)
;; with vector-set, only arg 1 (the vector) is actually mutated
;; TODO: is this always true? do we have problems with self-recursive vecs??
(inline-ok? (cadr exp) ivars args arg-used return)
)
(else
(for-each
(lambda (e)
(inline-ok? e ivars args arg-used return))