Issue #552 - Add 'else' clause for cond-expands

This commit is contained in:
Justin Ethier 2025-01-18 10:38:35 -08:00
parent 2d833cd6c1
commit c325a8a8e5
4 changed files with 21 additions and 11 deletions

View file

@ -20,7 +20,8 @@
(srfi 2)
(srfi 69)
)
))
)
(else #f))
;; symbol -> hash-table -> boolean
;; Is it OK to inline code replacing ref, based on call graph data from lookup table?
@ -261,4 +262,5 @@
; (ast:ast->pp-sexp
; (opt:local-var-reduction (ast:sexp->ast sexp)))
;)
))
)
(else #f))

View file

@ -14,7 +14,9 @@
(scheme cyclone ast)
(scheme cyclone primitives)
(scheme cyclone util)
(scheme cyclone pretty-print))))
(scheme cyclone pretty-print)))
(else
#f))
;; Local variable reduction:
;; Reduce given sexp by replacing certain lambda calls with a let containing
@ -434,4 +436,5 @@
(ast:ast->pp-sexp
(opt:local-var-reduction (ast:sexp->ast sexp)))
)
))
)
(else #f))

View file

@ -18,9 +18,9 @@
(scheme cyclone util)
(scheme cyclone pretty-print)
(srfi 2)
(srfi 69)
)
))
(srfi 69)))
(else
#f))
;; Predicate to determine if a function can be memoized
;; var - symbol - global name of the function
@ -371,4 +371,5 @@
;; ; (ast:ast->pp-sexp
;; ; (opt:local-var-reduction (ast:sexp->ast sexp)))
;; ;)
))
)
(else #f))

View file

@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
(scheme base)
(scheme read)
(scheme cyclone pretty-print)
(scheme cyclone util))))
(scheme cyclone util)))
(else #f))
;;
;; TODO: call this from cyclone.scm after it works, probably after "resolve macros"
@ -59,7 +60,9 @@
(define (search exp vars)
(cond-expand
(program
(pretty-print `(search ,exp ,vars))(newline))) ;; Debugging
(pretty-print `(search ,exp ,vars))(newline)) ;; Debugging
(else
#f))
(cond
;((ast:lambda? exp) 'TODO)
((const? exp) #f)
@ -111,4 +114,5 @@
;(if 1 2 3 4)
(let ((sexp (read-all (open-input-file "validation.scm"))))
(validate-keyword-syntax sexp))))
(validate-keyword-syntax sexp)))
(else #f))